Learn how Buzz and Stoat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Buzz appears to have several advantages over Stoat, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Buzz significantly outpaces Stoat in community adoption with 31,966 stars compared to 3,273 stars on GitHub. This 9.8x difference suggests Buzz has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Buzz has 4,118 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Buzz is growing faster, adding 10,285 stars in the last 30 days (+47%) against adding 84 stars for Stoat (+2.6%). Buzz is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Buzz last updated 8 hours ago and Stoat 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Buzz uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri, Dart.
Stoat has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Buzz which began 6 months ago. This 4.8-year head start suggests Stoat may have more mature features and established processes.
Buzz is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Stoat's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Stoat extends into Encrypted Communication.
Both Buzz and Stoat offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs