Learn how Buzz and Stoat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

Both Buzz and Stoat have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Buzz significantly outpaces Stoat in community adoption with 27,109 stars compared to 3,216 stars on GitHub. This 8.4x difference suggests Buzz has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Buzz has 3,317 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Buzz is growing faster, adding 23,454 stars in the last 30 days (+642%) against adding 63 stars for Stoat (+2%). Buzz is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Buzz last updated 1 hour ago and Stoat 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Buzz uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri, Dart.
Stoat has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Buzz which began 5 months ago. This 4.8-year head start suggests Stoat may have more mature features and established processes.
Buzz is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Stoat's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Stoat extends into Encrypted Communication.
Stoat provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Buzz may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Repository