Learn how Cinny and Stoat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Cinny and Stoat have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Cinny having 3,858 stars and Stoat having 3,247 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Cinny has 573 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Stoat is growing faster, adding 71 stars in the last 30 days (+2.2%) against adding 52 stars for Cinny (+1.4%). Stoat is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cinny last updated 10 days ago and Stoat 3 days ago.
Cinny uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, SCSS while Stoat leverages Bash, Python, Rust.
Both projects started around the same time, with Cinny beginning 5 years ago and Stoat 5 years ago.
Cinny is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Stoat's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: Cinny also focuses on Decentralized Social Networks.
Stoat provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Cinny may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs