Learn how Cinny and Stoat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Both Cinny and Stoat have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Cinny having 3,820 stars and Stoat having 3,188 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Cinny has 560 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cinny last updated 14 hours ago and Stoat 1 day ago.
Cinny uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, SCSS while Stoat leverages Bash, Python, Rust.
Both projects started around the same time, with Cinny beginning 5 years ago and Stoat 5 years ago.
Cinny is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Stoat's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: Cinny also focuses on Decentralized Social Networks.
Stoat provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Cinny may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Cinnyvs
MattermostActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Self-hosted
Repository
Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.
