Learn how Cinny and Stoat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 days agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v4.12.7License
AGPL-3.0Repository
cinnyapp/cinny
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v0.16.2Self-hosted
YesRepository
stoatchat/stoatchat
Both Cinny and Stoat have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Cinny having 3,947 stars and Stoat having 3,420 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Cinny has 598 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Stoat is growing faster, adding 68 stars in the last 30 days (+2%) against adding 40 stars for Cinny (+1%). Stoat is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cinny last updated 5 days ago and Stoat 1 day ago.
Cinny uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, SCSS while Stoat leverages Bash, Python, Rust.
Both projects started around the same time, with Cinny beginning 6 years ago and Stoat 5 years ago.
Cinny is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Stoat's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: Cinny also focuses on Decentralized Social Networks.
Stoat provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Cinny may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs