Learn how Cinny and Quiet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
20 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v4.12.7License
AGPL-3.0Repository
cinnyapp/cinny
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
11.3.0License
GPL-3.0Repository
tryquiet/quiet
Both Cinny and Quiet have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Cinny having 3,937 stars and Quiet having 2,659 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Cinny has 596 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Cinny is growing faster, adding 39 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 12 stars for Quiet (+0.5%). Cinny is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cinny last updated 20 hours ago and Quiet 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cinny uses CSS, SCSS while Quiet leverages Bash, Python, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, C++, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB, NestJS.
Both projects started around the same time, with Cinny beginning 6 years ago and Quiet 5 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Cinny is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Quiet uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: Cinny also focuses on Decentralized Social Networks.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs