What is the main difference between Cinny and Rocket.Chat?

Cinny and Rocket.Chat are both team chat & messaging tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Cinny or Rocket.Chat?

The choice between Cinny and Rocket.Chat depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Cinny to Rocket.Chat?

Migration between Cinny and Rocket.Chat is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

c15t – Open-source cookie banner, built for control and lightening fast modern web apps.

Learn more

Cinny vs Rocket.Chat

Learn how Cinny and Rocket.Chat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

Cinny

Cinny offers a simple, elegant, and secure interface for Matrix-based conversations, protected by end-to-end encryption.

Visit Cinny Read more

3,957stars+43(+1.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 hours ago
Repository age
6 years
Version
v4.12.8
License
AGPL-3.0
Repository
cinnyapp/cinny

Rocket.Chat

Open source communication platform combining messaging, voice, video, and AI for organizations that need full data control, air-gapped deployments, and zero-trust security.

Visit Rocket.Chat Read more

46,352stars+149(+0.3%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
3 hours ago
Repository age
11 years
Version
8.9.0
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
rocket.chat

Detailed Comparison

Rocket.Chat appears to have several advantages over Cinny, particularly in popularity, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Rocket.Chat wins

Community & Popularity

Rocket.Chat significantly outpaces Cinny in community adoption with 46,352 stars compared to 3,957 stars on GitHub. This 11.7x difference suggests Rocket.Chat has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Rocket.Chat has 14,067 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Cinny wins

Growth Momentum

Cinny is growing faster, adding 43 stars in the last 30 days (+1.1%) against adding 149 stars for Rocket.Chat (+0.3%). Cinny is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Cinny last updated 2 hours ago and Rocket.Chat 3 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Rocket.Chat leverages Bash, Meteor.

Rocket.Chat wins

Project Maturity

Rocket.Chat has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Cinny which began 6 years ago. This 6.0-year head start suggests Rocket.Chat may have more mature features and established processes.

Rocket.Chat wins

Licensing

Rocket.Chat uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Cinny's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Cinny also focuses on Encrypted Communication, Decentralized Social Networks while Rocket.Chat extends into Collaborative Workspaces, Video Conferencing & Virtual Office.

Rocket.Chat wins

Hosting & Deployment

Rocket.Chat provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Cinny may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.