Learn how Element and Rocket.Chat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Both Element and Rocket.Chat have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Rocket.Chat significantly outpaces Element in community adoption with 45,155 stars compared to 12,993 stars on GitHub. This 3.5x difference suggests Rocket.Chat has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Rocket.Chat has 13,524 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Element last updated 15 hours ago and Rocket.Chat 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Element uses Python, Perl while Rocket.Chat leverages SCSS, Meteor.
Both projects started around the same time, with Element beginning 11 years ago and Rocket.Chat 11 years ago.
Element is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Rocket.Chat's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Element also focuses on Encrypted Communication while Rocket.Chat extends into Collaborative Workspaces, Video Conferencing & Virtual Office.
Both Element and Rocket.Chat offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs