Learn how Element and Zulip differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Element and Zulip have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Zulip leads in popularity with 25,765 stars vs 13,403 stars for Element. The 92% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Zulip has 10,110 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Element and Zulip are moving at much the same rate, adding 84 stars and adding 208 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.6% vs +0.8%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Element last updated 17 hours ago and Zulip 5 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Element uses JSX, Perl while Zulip leverages Ruby.
Both projects started around the same time, with Element beginning 11 years ago and Zulip 11 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Element is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Zulip uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Element also focuses on Encrypted Communication.
Both Element and Zulip offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs