Learn how Element and Zulip differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Both Element and Zulip have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Zulip leads in popularity with 25,173 stars vs 13,093 stars for Element. The 92% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Zulip has 9,825 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Element last updated 18 hours ago and Zulip 13 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Element uses JSX, Perl while Zulip leverages Ruby.
Both projects started around the same time, with Element beginning 11 years ago and Zulip 11 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Element is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Zulip uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Element also focuses on Encrypted Communication.
Both Element and Zulip offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.