Learn how Buzz and Zulip differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

Both Buzz and Zulip have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Buzz and Zulip show comparable community engagement with 27,109 and 25,700 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Zulip has 10,064 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Buzz is growing faster, adding 23,454 stars in the last 30 days (+642%) against adding 205 stars for Zulip (+0.8%). Buzz is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Buzz last updated 1 hour ago and Zulip 3 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Buzz uses JSX, C, Rust, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri, Dart while Zulip leverages Ruby.
Zulip has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Buzz which began 5 months ago. This 10.6-year head start suggests Zulip may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging.
Zulip provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Buzz may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository