Learn how Hazel and Zulip differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.0.2License
FSL-1.1-ALv2Self-hosted
YesRepository
mapletechlabs/hazel
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
12.3License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
zulip/zulip
Zulip appears to have several advantages over Hazel, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Zulip significantly outpaces Hazel in community adoption with 26,114 stars compared to 729 stars on GitHub. This 35.8x difference suggests Zulip has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Zulip has 10,479 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Hazel and Zulip are moving at much the same rate, adding 5 stars and adding 163 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.7% vs +0.6%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hazel last updated 11 days ago and Zulip 6 hours ago.
Zulip has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Hazel which began 2 years ago. This 9.7-year head start suggests Zulip may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Hazel is licensed under FSL-1.1-ALv2 while Zulip uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging.
Both Hazel and Zulip offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs