Learn how Hazel and Mattermost differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.0.2License
FSL-1.1-ALv2Self-hosted
YesRepository
mapletechlabs/hazel
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
v12.0.1Self-hosted
YesRepository
mattermost
Both Hazel and Mattermost have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Mattermost significantly outpaces Hazel in community adoption with 39,434 stars compared to 729 stars on GitHub. This 54.1x difference suggests Mattermost has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Mattermost has 9,070 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Hazel and Mattermost are moving at much the same rate, adding 5 stars and adding 242 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.7% vs +0.6%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hazel last updated 11 days ago and Mattermost 6 hours ago.
Mattermost has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Hazel which began 2 years ago. This 10.0-year head start suggests Mattermost may have more mature features and established processes.
Hazel is licensed under FSL-1.1-ALv2, while Mattermost's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mattermost extends into Collaborative Workspaces, Encrypted Communication.
Both Hazel and Mattermost offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs