Learn how Fluxer and Mattermost differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Both Fluxer and Mattermost have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Mattermost significantly outpaces Fluxer in community adoption with 36,224 stars compared to 8,259 stars on GitHub. This 4.4x difference suggests Mattermost has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Mattermost has 8,531 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Fluxer last updated 8 days ago and Mattermost 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Fluxer uses Python, Rust, Ruby while Mattermost leverages SCSS.
Mattermost has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Fluxer which began 4 months ago. This 10.7-year head start suggests Mattermost may have more mature features and established processes.
Fluxer is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Mattermost's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mattermost extends into Collaborative Workspaces.
Both Fluxer and Mattermost offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs