What is the main difference between Fluxer and Mattermost?

Fluxer and Mattermost are both team chat & messaging tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Fluxer or Mattermost?

The choice between Fluxer and Mattermost depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Fluxer to Mattermost?

Migration between Fluxer and Mattermost is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Start using Open Source today

Learn more

Fluxer vs Mattermost

Learn how Fluxer and Mattermost differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

Fluxer

Free, open-source instant messaging and VoIP platform with full Markdown support, voice/video calls, moderation tools, and self-hosting options for communities.

Visit Fluxer Read more

Stars
8,555
Forks
489
Last commit
1 month ago
Repository age
4 months
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes

View Repository

Auto-fetched 9 hours ago.

Mattermost

Mattermost provides a flexible, open-source platform for secure team collaboration, designed for organizations with strict security and privacy requirements.

Visit Mattermost Read more

Stars
36,607
Forks
8,596
Last commit
12 hours ago
Repository age
11 years
Self-hosted
Yes

View Repository

Auto-fetched 9 hours ago.

Detailed Comparison

Mattermost appears to have several advantages over Fluxer, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Mattermost wins

Community & Popularity

Mattermost significantly outpaces Fluxer in community adoption with 36,607 stars compared to 8,555 stars on GitHub. This 4.3x difference suggests Mattermost has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Mattermost has 8,596 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Mattermost wins

Development Activity

Mattermost shows more recent development activity with its last commit 12 hours ago, while Fluxer was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Mattermost is being more actively maintained.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Fluxer uses Python, Rust, Ruby while Mattermost leverages SCSS.

Mattermost wins

Project Maturity

Mattermost has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Fluxer which began 4 months ago. This 10.7-year head start suggests Mattermost may have more mature features and established processes.

Fluxer wins

Licensing

Fluxer is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Mattermost's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mattermost extends into Collaborative Workspaces.

Comparable