Learn how Mattermost and Nextcloud differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these collaborative workspaces is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Mattermost and Nextcloud have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Mattermost and Nextcloud show comparable community engagement with 38,841 and 36,479 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Mattermost has 8,920 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Mattermost and Nextcloud are moving at much the same rate, adding 337 stars and adding 262 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.9% vs +0.7%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Mattermost last updated 7 hours ago and Nextcloud 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Mattermost uses JSX, Golang while Nextcloud leverages Vue, PHP.
Both projects started around the same time, with Mattermost beginning 11 years ago and Nextcloud 10 years ago.
Nextcloud is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Mattermost's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Collaborative Workspaces. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mattermost also focuses on Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication while Nextcloud extends into Cloud File Sync & Share, Storage.
Both Mattermost and Nextcloud offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs