Learn how Mattermost and Nextcloud differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these collaborative workspaces is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Nextcloud appears to have several advantages over Mattermost, particularly in growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Mattermost and Nextcloud show comparable community engagement with 39,018 and 36,758 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Mattermost has 8,976 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Nextcloud is growing faster, adding 389 stars in the last 30 days (+1.1%) against adding 303 stars for Mattermost (+0.8%). Nextcloud is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Mattermost last updated 11 hours ago and Nextcloud 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Mattermost uses JSX, Golang while Nextcloud leverages Vue, PHP.
Both projects started around the same time, with Mattermost beginning 11 years ago and Nextcloud 10 years ago.
Nextcloud is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Mattermost's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Collaborative Workspaces. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mattermost also focuses on Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication while Nextcloud extends into Cloud File Sync & Share, Storage.
Both Mattermost and Nextcloud offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs