Learn how Nextcloud and Puter differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Nextcloud and Puter have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Nextcloud having 36,558 stars and Puter having 43,206 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Nextcloud has 5,133 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Nextcloud and Puter are moving at much the same rate, adding 305 stars and adding 349 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.8% vs +0.8%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Nextcloud last updated 9 hours ago and Puter 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Nextcloud uses SCSS, Vue, PHP.
Nextcloud has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Puter which began 2 years ago. This 7.9-year head start suggests Nextcloud may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share. However, they also have distinct specializations: Nextcloud also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Storage while Puter extends into Cloud Storage, Encrypted Storage.
Both Nextcloud and Puter offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.