Learn how Nextcloud and Puter differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Activity score

Activity score

Both Nextcloud and Puter have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Nextcloud having 36,143 stars and Puter having 42,717 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Nextcloud has 5,065 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Nextcloud last updated 35 minutes ago and Puter 1 hour ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Nextcloud uses SCSS, Vue, PHP.
Nextcloud has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Puter which began 2 years ago. This 7.9-year head start suggests Nextcloud may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share. However, they also have distinct specializations: Nextcloud also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Storage while Puter extends into Cloud Storage, Encrypted Storage.
Both Nextcloud and Puter offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.