What is the main difference between Ente and Puter?

Ente and Puter are both cloud storage tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Ente or Puter?

The choice between Ente and Puter depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Ente to Puter?

Migration between Ente and Puter is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn More

Ente vs Puter

Learn how Ente and Puter differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud storage tools is best for you.

Ente

End-to-end encrypted cloud storage for photos and videos, offering privacy, security, and seamless cross-device syncing.

Visit Ente Read more

28,476stars+491(+1.8%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
5 hours ago
Repository age
4 years
Version
v1.3.61
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
ente-io/ente

Sponsor Ente ongithub.com

Puter

Puter is a cloud-based desktop OS you run in the browser, with built-in apps, file storage, and support for hosting web apps and sites.

Visit Puter Read more

43,206stars+349(+0.8%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
6 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
26.08.2
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
heyputer/puter

Detailed Comparison

Both Ente and Puter have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Puter wins

Community & Popularity

Puter leads in popularity with 43,206 stars vs 28,476 stars for Ente. The 52% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Puter has 4,032 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Ente wins

Growth Momentum

Ente is growing faster, adding 491 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against adding 349 stars for Puter (+0.8%). Ente is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Ente last updated 5 hours ago and Puter 6 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ente uses JSX, Python, Next.js, Golang, Rust, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, C++, Ruby, Kotlin, Tauri, Dart.

Ente wins

Project Maturity

Ente has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Puter which began 2 years ago. This 1.4-year head start suggests Ente may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud Storage, Encrypted Storage. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ente also focuses on Photo & Video Management while Puter extends into Cloud File Sync & Share.

Comparable