What is the main difference between Ente and Puter?

Ente and Puter are both encrypted storage tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Ente or Puter?

The choice between Ente and Puter depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Ente to Puter?

Migration between Ente and Puter is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.

Learn more

Ente vs Puter

Learn how Ente and Puter differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these encrypted storage tools is best for you.

Ente

End-to-end encrypted cloud storage for photos and videos, offering privacy, security, and seamless cross-device syncing.

Visit Ente Read more

29,570stars+512(+1.8%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
7 hours ago
Repository age
4 years
Version
v0.1.22
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
ente-io/ente

Puter

Puter is a cloud-based desktop OS you run in the browser, with built-in apps, file storage, and support for hosting web apps and sites.

Visit Puter Read more

43,875stars+281(+0.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
8 hours ago
Repository age
3 years
Version
26.10
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
heyputer/puter

Detailed Comparison

Ente appears to have several advantages over Puter, particularly in growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Comparable

Community & Popularity

Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Ente having 29,570 stars and Puter having 43,875 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Puter has 4,111 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Ente wins

Growth Momentum

Ente is growing faster, adding 512 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against adding 281 stars for Puter (+0.6%). Ente is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Ente last updated 7 hours ago and Puter 8 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ente uses JSX, Python, Next.js, Golang, Rust, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, C++, Ruby, Kotlin, Tauri, Dart.

Ente wins

Project Maturity

Ente has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Puter which began 3 years ago. This 1.4-year head start suggests Ente may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Encrypted Storage. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ente also focuses on Photo & Video Management while Puter extends into Cloud File Sync & Share.

Comparable