Learn how ownCloud and Puter differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both ownCloud and Puter have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Puter significantly outpaces ownCloud in community adoption with 43,251 stars compared to 2,104 stars on GitHub. This 20.6x difference suggests Puter has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Puter has 4,037 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
ownCloud and Puter are moving at much the same rate, adding 18 stars and adding 369 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.9% vs +0.9%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with ownCloud last updated 3 hours ago and Puter 9 hours ago.
ownCloud has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Puter which began 2 years ago. This 4.6-year head start suggests ownCloud may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: ownCloud is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Puter uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share, Cloud Storage. However, they also have distinct specializations: Puter extends into Encrypted Storage.
Both ownCloud and Puter offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs