What is the main difference between ownCloud and Puter?

ownCloud and Puter are both cloud file sync & share tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: ownCloud or Puter?

The choice between ownCloud and Puter depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from ownCloud to Puter?

Migration between ownCloud and Puter is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

ScreenshotOne – The screenshot API for developers. Render screenshots in one simple API call

Learn More

ownCloud vs Puter

Learn how ownCloud and Puter differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.

ownCloud

Self-hostable file platform for enterprises needing data sovereignty, real-time document collaboration, and compliance with GDPR, HIPAA, and other regulations.

Visit ownCloud Read more

2,121stars+30(+1.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
10 hours ago
Repository age
7 years
Version
v8.2.0
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
owncloud/ocis

Puter

Puter is a cloud-based desktop OS you run in the browser, with built-in apps, file storage, and support for hosting web apps and sites.

Visit Puter Read more

43,534stars+461(+1.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
9 hours ago
Repository age
3 years
Version
26.09
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
heyputer/puter

Detailed Comparison

Both ownCloud and Puter have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Puter wins

Community & Popularity

Puter significantly outpaces ownCloud in community adoption with 43,534 stars compared to 2,121 stars on GitHub. This 20.5x difference suggests Puter has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Puter has 4,059 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

ownCloud wins

Growth Momentum

ownCloud is growing faster, adding 30 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against adding 461 stars for Puter (+1.1%). ownCloud is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with ownCloud last updated 10 hours ago and Puter 9 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: ownCloud uses Python, SCSS, Golang, Vue, PHP.

ownCloud wins

Project Maturity

ownCloud has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Puter which began 3 years ago. This 4.6-year head start suggests ownCloud may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: ownCloud is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Puter uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share, Cloud Storage. However, they also have distinct specializations: Puter extends into Encrypted Storage.

Comparable