Learn how Hoodik and ownCloud differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v2.6.1Self-hosted
YesRepository
hudikhq/hoodik
Last 30 days
Last commit
14 hours agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v8.2.3License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
owncloud/ocis
Both Hoodik and ownCloud have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Hoodik having 1,552 stars and ownCloud having 2,183 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, ownCloud has 286 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Hoodik is growing faster, adding 36 stars in the last 30 days (+2.4%) against adding 35 stars for ownCloud (+1.6%). Hoodik is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hoodik last updated 3 days ago and ownCloud 14 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hoodik uses Rust while ownCloud leverages Python, Golang, SCSS, PHP.
ownCloud has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Hoodik which began 4 years ago. This 3.4-year head start suggests ownCloud may have more mature features and established processes.
ownCloud is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Hoodik's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share.
Both Hoodik and ownCloud offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs