Learn how ownCloud and Sync-in differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both ownCloud and Sync-in have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with ownCloud having 2,104 stars and Sync-in having 1,698 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, ownCloud has 268 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Sync-in is growing faster, adding 86 stars in the last 30 days (+5.3%) against adding 18 stars for ownCloud (+0.9%). Sync-in is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with ownCloud last updated 3 hours ago and Sync-in 19 days ago.
ownCloud has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Sync-in which began 1 year ago. This 6.0-year head start suggests ownCloud may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: ownCloud is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Sync-in uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share. However, they also have distinct specializations: ownCloud also focuses on Cloud Storage while Sync-in extends into Collaborative Workspaces, Secure Document Sharing.
Both ownCloud and Sync-in offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs