Learn how ownCloud and Seafile differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both ownCloud and Seafile have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Seafile significantly outpaces ownCloud in community adoption with 15,170 stars compared to 2,104 stars on GitHub. This 7.2x difference suggests Seafile has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Seafile has 1,675 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
ownCloud and Seafile are moving at much the same rate, adding 18 stars and adding 131 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.9% vs +0.9%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with ownCloud last updated 3 hours ago and Seafile 18 days ago.
Seafile has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to ownCloud which began 7 years ago. This 7.2-year head start suggests Seafile may have more mature features and established processes.
ownCloud is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Seafile's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share. However, they also have distinct specializations: ownCloud also focuses on Cloud Storage while Seafile extends into Document Management Systems, Secure Document Sharing.
Both ownCloud and Seafile offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs