Learn how OpenCloud and Seafile differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Repository

Both OpenCloud and Seafile have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Seafile leads in popularity with 15,164 stars vs 5,848 stars for OpenCloud. The 159% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Seafile has 1,675 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenCloud is growing faster, adding 109 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 141 stars for Seafile (+0.9%). OpenCloud is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenCloud last updated 3 days ago and Seafile 16 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenCloud uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Golang, PHP while Seafile leverages Python, C, Objective-C, C++.
Seafile has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to OpenCloud which began 2 years ago. This 12.7-year head start suggests Seafile may have more mature features and established processes.
OpenCloud is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Seafile's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share. However, they also have distinct specializations: Seafile extends into Document Management Systems, Secure Document Sharing.
OpenCloud provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Seafile may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs