Learn how OpenCloud and Seafile differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Activity score

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Activity score

Both OpenCloud and Seafile have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Seafile leads in popularity with 14,973 stars vs 5,706 stars for OpenCloud. The 162% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Seafile has 1,656 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenCloud last updated 14 hours ago and Seafile 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenCloud uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Golang, PHP while Seafile leverages Python, C, Objective-C, C++.
Seafile has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to OpenCloud which began 2 years ago. This 12.7-year head start suggests Seafile may have more mature features and established processes.
OpenCloud is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Seafile's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share. However, they also have distinct specializations: Seafile extends into Document Management Systems, Secure Document Sharing.
OpenCloud provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Seafile may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs