Learn how Firefiles and Seafile differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 6 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .


Seafile appears to have several advantages over Firefiles, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Seafile significantly outpaces Firefiles in community adoption with 14,619 stars compared to 368 stars on GitHub. This 39.7x difference suggests Seafile has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Seafile has 1,637 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Seafile shows more recent development activity with its last commit 9 days ago, while Firefiles was last updated 6 months ago. This suggests Seafile is being more actively maintained.
Firefiles uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js while Seafile leverages Bash, Python, C, Objective-C, C++.
Seafile has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Firefiles which began 4 years ago. This 9.5-year head start suggests Seafile may have more mature features and established processes.
Firefiles is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Seafile's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share. However, they also have distinct specializations: Firefiles also focuses on Cloud Storage, File Management while Seafile extends into Document Management Systems, Secure Document Sharing.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs