Learn how Seafile and Spacedrive differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Seafile and Spacedrive have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Spacedrive leads in popularity with 38,835 stars vs 15,164 stars for Seafile. The 156% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Seafile has 1,675 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Seafile is growing faster, adding 141 stars in the last 30 days (+0.9%) against adding 189 stars for Spacedrive (+0.5%). Seafile is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Seafile last updated 16 days ago and Spacedrive 26 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Seafile uses Python, C++ while Spacedrive leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, SCSS, Rust, Java, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB, Tauri.
Seafile has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Spacedrive which began 5 years ago. This 9.3-year head start suggests Seafile may have more mature features and established processes.
Spacedrive is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Seafile's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share. However, they also have distinct specializations: Seafile also focuses on Document Management Systems, Secure Document Sharing while Spacedrive extends into Distributed Storage, File Management.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs