Learn how OpenCloud and Spacedrive differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Spacedrive appears to have several advantages over OpenCloud, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Spacedrive significantly outpaces OpenCloud in community adoption with 37,870 stars compared to 5,264 stars on GitHub. This 7.2x difference suggests Spacedrive has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Spacedrive has 1,270 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenCloud last updated 14 hours ago and Spacedrive 6 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenCloud uses Golang, PHP while Spacedrive leverages Next.js, SCSS, Rust, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB, Tauri.
Spacedrive has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to OpenCloud which began 1 year ago. This 3.3-year head start suggests Spacedrive may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: OpenCloud is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Spacedrive uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share. However, they also have distinct specializations: Spacedrive extends into Distributed Storage, File Management.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs