Learn how OpenCloud and Twake Drive differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v8.1.0License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
opencloud
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
1.108.0License
AGPL-3.0Repository
linagora/twake-drive
OpenCloud appears to have several advantages over Twake Drive, particularly in popularity, growth and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenCloud significantly outpaces Twake Drive in community adoption with 6,218 stars compared to 989 stars on GitHub. This 6.3x difference suggests OpenCloud has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenCloud has 256 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
OpenCloud is growing faster, adding 158 stars in the last 30 days (+2.6%) against adding 3 stars for Twake Drive (+0.3%). OpenCloud is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenCloud last updated 7 hours ago and Twake Drive 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenCloud uses CSS, Bash, Golang, PHP.
Twake Drive has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to OpenCloud which began 2 years ago. This 8.2-year head start suggests Twake Drive may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: OpenCloud is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Twake Drive uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share.
OpenCloud provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Twake Drive may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs