Learn how Nextcloud and Twake Drive differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v33.0.10License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
nextcloud/server
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
1.108.0License
AGPL-3.0Repository
linagora/twake-drive
Nextcloud appears to have several advantages over Twake Drive, particularly in popularity, growth and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Nextcloud significantly outpaces Twake Drive in community adoption with 37,278 stars compared to 989 stars on GitHub. This 37.7x difference suggests Nextcloud has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Nextcloud has 5,304 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Nextcloud is growing faster, adding 373 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 3 stars for Twake Drive (+0.3%). Nextcloud is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Nextcloud last updated 4 hours ago and Twake Drive 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Nextcloud uses CSS, Bash, SCSS, PHP, Vue while Twake Drive leverages JSX.
Both projects started around the same time, with Nextcloud beginning 10 years ago and Twake Drive 10 years ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share. However, they also have distinct specializations: Nextcloud also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces.
Nextcloud provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Twake Drive may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs