Learn how Cozy and Twake Drive differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Cozy and Twake Drive have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Cozy having 1,267 stars and Twake Drive having 988 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Twake Drive has 165 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Twake Drive is growing faster, adding 4 stars in the last 30 days (+0.4%) against losing 2 stars for Cozy (-0.2%). Twake Drive is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cozy last updated 8 hours ago and Twake Drive 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cozy uses CSS, Bash, Golang while Twake Drive leverages Typescript, JSX.
Both projects started around the same time, with Cozy beginning 10 years ago and Twake Drive 10 years ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share.
Cozy provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Twake Drive may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.