Learn how Cozy and Peergos differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
1.6.66License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
cozy/cozy-stack
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
13 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Repository
peergos/peergos
Peergos appears to have several advantages over Cozy, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Peergos leads in popularity with 2,542 stars vs 1,268 stars for Cozy. The 100% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Peergos has 203 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Peergos is growing faster, adding 16 stars in the last 30 days (+0.6%) against losing 2 stars for Cozy (-0.2%). Peergos is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cozy last updated 8 hours ago and Peergos 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cozy uses JavaScript, CSS, Golang while Peergos leverages Java.
Peergos has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Cozy which began 10 years ago. This 2.9-year head start suggests Peergos may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share. However, they also have distinct specializations: Peergos extends into Encrypted Storage.
Cozy provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Peergos may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.