Learn how Cozy and Peergos differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Both Cozy and Peergos have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Peergos leads in popularity with 2,397 stars vs 1,264 stars for Cozy. The 90% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Peergos has 188 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cozy last updated 1 day ago and Peergos 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cozy uses JavaScript, CSS, Golang while Peergos leverages Java.
Peergos has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Cozy which began 10 years ago. This 2.9-year head start suggests Peergos may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share. However, they also have distinct specializations: Cozy also focuses on Cloud Storage, Security & Privacy while Peergos extends into Distributed Storage, Encrypted Storage.
Cozy provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Peergos may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.