What is the main difference between Cozy and PearPass?

Cozy and PearPass are both open source tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Cozy or PearPass?

The choice between Cozy and PearPass depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Cozy to PearPass?

Migration between Cozy and PearPass is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn More

Cozy vs PearPass

Learn how Cozy and PearPass differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.

Cozy

Open-source personal cloud that automatically gathers all your data from third-party services. French-hosted with privacy-first design, no ads, and seamless device sync.

Visit Cozy Read more

1,270stars+1(+0.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
3 hours ago
Repository age
10 years
Version
1.6.63
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
cozy/cozy-stack

PearPass

Open-source password manager with peer-to-peer syncing, local storage, and end-to-end encryption. No cloud servers, complete privacy control across devices.

Visit PearPass Read more

538stars+5(+0.9%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 months ago
Repository age
10 months
Version
v2.1.0
License
Apache-2.0
Repository
tetherto/pearpass-app-desktop

Detailed Comparison

Cozy appears to have several advantages over PearPass, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Cozy wins

Community & Popularity

Cozy leads in popularity with 1,270 stars vs 538 stars for PearPass. The 136% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Cozy has 143 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

PearPass wins

Growth Momentum

PearPass is growing faster, adding 5 stars in the last 30 days (+0.9%) against adding 1 stars for Cozy (+0.1%). PearPass is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Cozy wins

Development Activity

Cozy shows more recent development activity with its last commit 3 hours ago, while PearPass was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Cozy is being more actively maintained.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cozy uses CSS, Golang while PearPass leverages Typescript, JSX.

Cozy wins

Project Maturity

Cozy has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to PearPass which began 10 months ago. This 9.5-year head start suggests Cozy may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Cozy is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while PearPass uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Cozy also focuses on Cloud File Sync & Share while PearPass extends into Password Managers.

Cozy wins

Hosting & Deployment

Cozy provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while PearPass may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

Other tool comparisons to consider