PearPass vs Vaultwarden
Learn how PearPass and Vaultwarden differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password managers is best for you.
Learn how PearPass and Vaultwarden differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password managers is best for you.
PearPass
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 months agoRepository age
10 monthsVersion
v2.1.0License
Apache-2.0Repository
tetherto/pearpass-app-desktop
Vaultwarden
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
9 yearsVersion
1.37.4License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
dani-garcia/vaultwarden
Detailed Comparison
Vaultwarden appears to have several advantages over PearPass, particularly in popularity, growth, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Vaultwarden appears to have several advantages over PearPass, particularly in popularity, growth, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Vaultwarden significantly outpaces PearPass in community adoption with 68,580 stars compared to 537 stars on GitHub. This 127.7x difference suggests Vaultwarden has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Vaultwarden has 3,284 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Vaultwarden is growing faster, adding 1,600 stars in the last 30 days (+2.4%) against adding 4 stars for PearPass (+0.8%). Vaultwarden is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Development Activity
Vaultwarden shows more recent development activity with its last commit 9 hours ago, while PearPass was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Vaultwarden is being more actively maintained.
Project Maturity
Vaultwarden has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to PearPass which began 10 months ago. This 7.9-year head start suggests Vaultwarden may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
The projects use different licenses: PearPass is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Vaultwarden uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Password Managers.
Hosting & Deployment
Vaultwarden provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while PearPass may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Sent – Messaging Infrastructure for Developers. One API for SMS, WhatsApp, and RCS across 190+ countries.