What is the main difference between PearPass and TeamPass?

PearPass and TeamPass are both password managers but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: PearPass or TeamPass?

The choice between PearPass and TeamPass depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from PearPass to TeamPass?

Migration between PearPass and TeamPass is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – Messaging Infrastructure for Developers. One API for SMS, WhatsApp, and RCS across 190+ countries.

Learn more

PearPass vs TeamPass

Learn how PearPass and TeamPass differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password managers is best for you.

PearPass

Open-source password manager with peer-to-peer syncing, local storage, and end-to-end encryption. No cloud servers, complete privacy control across devices.

Visit PearPass Read more

543stars+8(+1.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 months ago
Repository age
11 months
Version
v2.1.0
License
Apache-2.0
Repository
pearpass-app-desktop

TeamPass

Collaborative password manager with folder-level access control, AES-256-GCM encryption, governance tools, and Linux password rotation, runs on your own servers.

Visit TeamPass Read more

1,863stars+34(+1.9%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
6 hours ago
Repository age
15 years
Version
3.2.3.3
License
GPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
teampass

Detailed Comparison

TeamPass appears to have several advantages over PearPass, particularly in popularity, growth, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

TeamPass wins

Community & Popularity

TeamPass significantly outpaces PearPass in community adoption with 1,863 stars compared to 543 stars on GitHub. This 3.4x difference suggests TeamPass has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, TeamPass has 571 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

TeamPass wins

Growth Momentum

TeamPass is growing faster, adding 34 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 8 stars for PearPass (+1.5%). TeamPass is both larger and pulling further ahead.

TeamPass wins

Development Activity

TeamPass shows more recent development activity with its last commit 6 hours ago, while PearPass was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests TeamPass is being more actively maintained.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: PearPass uses Typescript, JSX while TeamPass leverages CSS, PHP.

TeamPass wins

Project Maturity

TeamPass has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to PearPass which began 11 months ago. This 14.2-year head start suggests TeamPass may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: PearPass is licensed under Apache-2.0 while TeamPass uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Password Managers.

TeamPass wins

Hosting & Deployment

TeamPass provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while PearPass may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.