What is the main difference between PearPass and TeamPass?

PearPass and TeamPass are both password managers but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: PearPass or TeamPass?

The choice between PearPass and TeamPass depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from PearPass to TeamPass?

Migration between PearPass and TeamPass is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn More

PearPass vs TeamPass

Learn how PearPass and TeamPass differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password managers is best for you.

PearPass

Open-source password manager with peer-to-peer syncing, local storage, and end-to-end encryption. No cloud servers, complete privacy control across devices.

Visit PearPass Read more

537stars+4(+0.8%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 months ago
Repository age
10 months
Version
v2.1.0
License
Apache-2.0
Repository
tetherto/pearpass-app-desktop

TeamPass

Collaborative password manager with folder-level access control, AES-256-GCM encryption, governance tools, and Linux password rotation, runs on your own servers.

Visit TeamPass Read more

1,831stars+3(+0.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
16 hours ago
Repository age
15 years
Version
3.2.2.7
License
GPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
nilsteampassnet/teampass

Sponsor TeamPass ongithub.com

Detailed Comparison

TeamPass appears to have several advantages over PearPass, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

TeamPass wins

Community & Popularity

TeamPass significantly outpaces PearPass in community adoption with 1,831 stars compared to 537 stars on GitHub. This 3.4x difference suggests TeamPass has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, TeamPass has 571 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

PearPass wins

Growth Momentum

PearPass is growing faster, adding 4 stars in the last 30 days (+0.8%) against adding 3 stars for TeamPass (+0.2%). PearPass is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

TeamPass wins

Development Activity

TeamPass shows more recent development activity with its last commit 16 hours ago, while PearPass was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests TeamPass is being more actively maintained.

TeamPass wins

Project Maturity

TeamPass has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to PearPass which began 10 months ago. This 14.2-year head start suggests TeamPass may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: PearPass is licensed under Apache-2.0 while TeamPass uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Password Managers.

TeamPass wins

Hosting & Deployment

TeamPass provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while PearPass may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

Other tool comparisons to consider