Learn how Psono and TeamPass differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password managers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsLicense
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
psono-server
Last 30 days

TeamPass appears to have several advantages over Psono, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
TeamPass significantly outpaces Psono in community adoption with 1,863 stars compared to 104 stars on GitHub. This 17.9x difference suggests TeamPass has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, TeamPass has 571 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
TeamPass is growing faster, adding 34 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 1 stars for Psono (+1%). TeamPass is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Psono last updated 5 hours ago and TeamPass 6 hours ago.
TeamPass has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Psono which began 10 years ago. This 4.8-year head start suggests TeamPass may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Psono is licensed under Apache-2.0 while TeamPass uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Password Managers.
Both Psono and TeamPass offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.