Learn how Padloc and Psono differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password managers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
13 yearsVersion
v4.3.0License
AGPL-3.0Repository
padloc/padloc
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsLicense
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
psono-server
Both Padloc and Psono have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Padloc significantly outpaces Psono in community adoption with 2,937 stars compared to 104 stars on GitHub. This 28.2x difference suggests Padloc has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Padloc has 269 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Psono is growing faster, adding 1 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 14 stars for Padloc (+0.5%). Psono is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Padloc last updated 3 days ago and Psono 6 hours ago.
Padloc has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Psono which began 10 years ago. This 2.9-year head start suggests Padloc may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Padloc is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Psono uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Password Managers.
Psono provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Padloc may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.