Padloc vs Vaultwarden
Learn how Padloc and Vaultwarden differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password managers is best for you.
Learn how Padloc and Vaultwarden differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password managers is best for you.
Padloc
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 years agoRepository age
13 yearsVersion
v4.3.0License
AGPL-3.0Repository
padloc/padloc
Vaultwarden
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
9 yearsVersion
1.37.4License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
dani-garcia/vaultwarden
Detailed Comparison
Vaultwarden appears to have several advantages over Padloc, particularly in popularity, growth, activity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Vaultwarden appears to have several advantages over Padloc, particularly in popularity, growth, activity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Vaultwarden significantly outpaces Padloc in community adoption with 68,580 stars compared to 2,925 stars on GitHub. This 23.4x difference suggests Vaultwarden has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Vaultwarden has 3,284 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Vaultwarden is growing faster, adding 1,600 stars in the last 30 days (+2.4%) against adding 5 stars for Padloc (+0.2%). Vaultwarden is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Development Activity
Vaultwarden shows more recent development activity with its last commit 9 hours ago, while Padloc was last updated 2 years ago. This suggests Vaultwarden is being more actively maintained.
Project Maturity
Padloc has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Vaultwarden which began 9 years ago. This 4.3-year head start suggests Padloc may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Password Managers.
Hosting & Deployment
Vaultwarden provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Padloc may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.