Learn how Padloc and Passbolt differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these security & privacy tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 1 year and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Passbolt appears to have several advantages over Padloc, particularly in popularity, activity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Passbolt leads in popularity with 5,903 stars vs 2,918 stars for Padloc. The 102% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Passbolt has 381 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Passbolt shows more recent development activity with its last commit 3 days ago, while Padloc was last updated 1 year ago. This suggests Passbolt is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Padloc uses Typescript, Rust, Tauri while Passbolt leverages PHP.
Padloc has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Passbolt which began 10 years ago. This 2.3-year head start suggests Padloc may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Security & Privacy, Password Managers.
Passbolt provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Padloc may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.