Learn how Bitwarden and Passbolt differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these security & privacy tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Bitwarden and Passbolt have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Bitwarden significantly outpaces Passbolt in community adoption with 18,588 stars compared to 5,903 stars on GitHub. This 3.1x difference suggests Bitwarden has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Bitwarden has 1,575 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Bitwarden last updated 16 hours ago and Passbolt 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Bitwarden uses SCSS, C# while Passbolt leverages PHP.
Both projects started around the same time, with Bitwarden beginning 10 years ago and Passbolt 10 years ago.
Passbolt is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Bitwarden's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Security & Privacy, Password Managers.
Both Bitwarden and Passbolt offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.