Learn how Bitwarden and Passbolt differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password managers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
22 hours agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
v2026.10.1License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
bitwarden/server
Last 30 days
Last commit
19 days agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
v5.17.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
passbolt_api
Bitwarden appears to have several advantages over Passbolt, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Bitwarden significantly outpaces Passbolt in community adoption with 20,596 stars compared to 6,217 stars on GitHub. This 3.3x difference suggests Bitwarden has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Bitwarden has 1,835 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Bitwarden is growing faster, adding 347 stars in the last 30 days (+1.7%) against adding 67 stars for Passbolt (+1.1%). Bitwarden is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Bitwarden last updated 22 hours ago and Passbolt 19 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Bitwarden uses SCSS, C# while Passbolt leverages PHP.
Both projects started around the same time, with Bitwarden beginning 11 years ago and Passbolt 11 years ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Password Managers.
Both Bitwarden and Passbolt offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.