Learn how KeePassXC and Passbolt differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password managers is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both KeePassXC and Passbolt have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
KeePassXC significantly outpaces Passbolt in community adoption with 26,722 stars compared to 5,862 stars on GitHub. This 4.6x difference suggests KeePassXC has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, KeePassXC has 1,758 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with KeePassXC last updated 6 days ago and Passbolt 16 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: KeePassXC uses Typescript, Python, Golang, C, Objective-C, C++ while Passbolt leverages JavaScript, PHP.
Both projects started around the same time, with KeePassXC beginning 10 years ago and Passbolt 10 years ago.
Passbolt is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while KeePassXC's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Password Managers. However, they also have distinct specializations: KeePassXC also focuses on Secure & Encrypted Notes while Passbolt extends into Security & Privacy.
Both KeePassXC and Passbolt offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.