Learn how KeePassXC and Passbolt differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password managers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

KeePassXC appears to have several advantages over Passbolt, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
KeePassXC significantly outpaces Passbolt in community adoption with 29,016 stars compared to 6,142 stars on GitHub. This 4.7x difference suggests KeePassXC has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, KeePassXC has 1,924 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
KeePassXC is growing faster, adding 401 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against adding 45 stars for Passbolt (+0.7%). KeePassXC is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with KeePassXC last updated 6 days ago and Passbolt 12 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: KeePassXC uses Typescript, Python, Golang, C, Objective-C, C++ while Passbolt leverages JavaScript, PHP.
Both projects started around the same time, with KeePassXC beginning 11 years ago and Passbolt 11 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: KeePassXC is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Passbolt uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Password Managers. However, they also have distinct specializations: KeePassXC also focuses on Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Both KeePassXC and Passbolt offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.