KeePassXC significantly outpaces Padloc in community adoption with 28,213 stars compared to 2,923 stars on GitHub. This 9.7x difference suggests KeePassXC has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, KeePassXC has 1,860 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

KeePassXC shows more recent development activity with its last commit 7 days ago, while Padloc was last updated 1 year ago. This suggests KeePassXC is being more actively maintained.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: KeePassXC uses Python, Golang, C, Objective-C, C++ while Padloc leverages JavaScript, Rust, Tauri.

Padloc has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to KeePassXC which began 10 years ago. This 2.3-year head start suggests Padloc may have more mature features and established processes.

Padloc is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while KeePassXC's license terms are not publicly specified.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Password Managers. However, they also have distinct specializations: KeePassXC also focuses on Secure & Encrypted Notes while Padloc extends into Security & Privacy.

KeePassXC provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Padloc may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.