Learn how KeePassXC and Vaultwarden differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password managers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both KeePassXC and Vaultwarden have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Vaultwarden leads in popularity with 68,580 stars vs 29,102 stars for KeePassXC. The 136% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Vaultwarden has 3,284 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Vaultwarden is growing faster, adding 1,600 stars in the last 30 days (+2.4%) against adding 390 stars for KeePassXC (+1.4%). Vaultwarden is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with KeePassXC last updated 6 days ago and Vaultwarden 9 hours ago.
KeePassXC has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Vaultwarden which began 9 years ago. This 2.0-year head start suggests KeePassXC may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: KeePassXC is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Vaultwarden uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Password Managers. However, they also have distinct specializations: KeePassXC also focuses on Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Both KeePassXC and Vaultwarden offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.