What is the main difference between TeamPass and Vaultwarden?

TeamPass and Vaultwarden are both password managers but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: TeamPass or Vaultwarden?

The choice between TeamPass and Vaultwarden depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from TeamPass to Vaultwarden?

Migration between TeamPass and Vaultwarden is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – Messaging Infrastructure for Developers. One API for SMS, WhatsApp, and RCS across 190+ countries.

Learn more

TeamPass vs Vaultwarden

Learn how TeamPass and Vaultwarden differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password managers is best for you.

TeamPass

Collaborative password manager with folder-level access control, AES-256-GCM encryption, governance tools, and Linux password rotation, runs on your own servers.

Visit TeamPass Read more

1,863stars+34(+1.9%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
6 hours ago
Repository age
15 years
Version
3.2.3.3
License
GPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
teampass

Vaultwarden

Unofficial Bitwarden-compatible server written in Rust, built for self-hosting on low-resource hardware without sacrificing client compatibility.

Visit Vaultwarden Read more

69,685stars+1,490(+2.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
17 hours ago
Repository age
9 years
Version
1.37.4
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
vaultwarden

Detailed Comparison

Both TeamPass and Vaultwarden have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Vaultwarden wins

Community & Popularity

Vaultwarden significantly outpaces TeamPass in community adoption with 69,685 stars compared to 1,863 stars on GitHub. This 37.4x difference suggests Vaultwarden has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Vaultwarden has 3,369 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Vaultwarden wins

Growth Momentum

Vaultwarden is growing faster, adding 1,490 stars in the last 30 days (+2.2%) against adding 34 stars for TeamPass (+1.9%). Vaultwarden is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with TeamPass last updated 6 hours ago and Vaultwarden 17 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: TeamPass uses JavaScript, CSS, PHP while Vaultwarden leverages Typescript, Python, Rust.

TeamPass wins

Project Maturity

TeamPass has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Vaultwarden which began 9 years ago. This 6.2-year head start suggests TeamPass may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: TeamPass is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Vaultwarden uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable