What is the main difference between Padloc and TeamPass?

Padloc and TeamPass are both password managers but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Padloc or TeamPass?

The choice between Padloc and TeamPass depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Padloc to TeamPass?

Migration between Padloc and TeamPass is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – Messaging Infrastructure for Developers. One API for SMS, WhatsApp, and RCS across 190+ countries.

Learn more

Padloc vs TeamPass

Learn how Padloc and TeamPass differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password managers is best for you.

Padloc

Open-source password manager with end-to-end encryption for passwords, credit cards, notes, and documents. Cross-platform sync with secure sharing capabilities.

Visit Padloc Read more

2,937stars+14(+0.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
3 days ago
Repository age
13 years
Version
v4.3.0
License
AGPL-3.0
Repository
padloc/padloc

TeamPass

Collaborative password manager with folder-level access control, AES-256-GCM encryption, governance tools, and Linux password rotation, runs on your own servers.

Visit TeamPass Read more

1,863stars+34(+1.9%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
6 hours ago
Repository age
15 years
Version
3.2.3.3
License
GPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
teampass

Detailed Comparison

TeamPass appears to have several advantages over Padloc, particularly in growth, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Padloc wins

Community & Popularity

Padloc leads in popularity with 2,937 stars vs 1,863 stars for TeamPass. The 58% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, TeamPass has 571 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

TeamPass wins

Growth Momentum

TeamPass is growing faster, adding 34 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 14 stars for Padloc (+0.5%). TeamPass is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Padloc last updated 3 days ago and TeamPass 6 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Padloc uses Typescript, Rust, Tauri while TeamPass leverages PHP.

TeamPass wins

Project Maturity

TeamPass has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Padloc which began 13 years ago. This 1.9-year head start suggests TeamPass may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Padloc is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while TeamPass uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Password Managers.

TeamPass wins

Hosting & Deployment

TeamPass provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Padloc may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.