Learn how Padloc and TeamPass differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password managers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

TeamPass appears to have several advantages over Padloc, particularly in activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Padloc leads in popularity with 2,925 stars vs 1,831 stars for TeamPass. The 60% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, TeamPass has 571 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Padloc and TeamPass are moving at much the same rate, adding 5 stars and adding 3 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.2% vs +0.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
TeamPass shows more recent development activity with its last commit 16 hours ago, while Padloc was last updated 2 years ago. This suggests TeamPass is being more actively maintained.
TeamPass has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Padloc which began 13 years ago. This 1.9-year head start suggests TeamPass may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Padloc is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while TeamPass uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Password Managers.
TeamPass provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Padloc may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.