Learn how KeePassXC and TeamPass differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password managers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both KeePassXC and TeamPass have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
KeePassXC significantly outpaces TeamPass in community adoption with 29,102 stars compared to 1,831 stars on GitHub. This 15.9x difference suggests KeePassXC has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, KeePassXC has 1,929 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
KeePassXC is growing faster, adding 390 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against adding 3 stars for TeamPass (+0.2%). KeePassXC is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with KeePassXC last updated 6 days ago and TeamPass 16 hours ago.
TeamPass has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to KeePassXC which began 11 years ago. This 4.2-year head start suggests TeamPass may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the GPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Password Managers. However, they also have distinct specializations: KeePassXC also focuses on Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Both KeePassXC and TeamPass offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.