Learn how KeePassXC and TeamPass differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password managers is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days

Both KeePassXC and TeamPass have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
KeePassXC significantly outpaces TeamPass in community adoption with 29,500 stars compared to 1,863 stars on GitHub. This 15.8x difference suggests KeePassXC has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, KeePassXC has 1,982 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
KeePassXC and TeamPass are moving at much the same rate, adding 527 stars and adding 34 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.8% vs +1.9%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with KeePassXC last updated 3 days ago and TeamPass 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: KeePassXC uses Typescript, Python, Golang, C, Objective-C, C++ while TeamPass leverages JavaScript, PHP.
TeamPass has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to KeePassXC which began 11 years ago. This 4.2-year head start suggests TeamPass may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the GPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Password Managers. However, they also have distinct specializations: KeePassXC also focuses on Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Both KeePassXC and TeamPass offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.