Learn how KeePassXC and TeamPass differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password managers is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days

Both KeePassXC and TeamPass have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
KeePassXC significantly outpaces TeamPass in community adoption with 30,002 stars compared to 1,892 stars on GitHub. This 15.9x difference suggests KeePassXC has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, KeePassXC has 2,041 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
TeamPass is growing faster, adding 57 stars in the last 30 days (+3.1%) against adding 739 stars for KeePassXC (+2.5%). TeamPass is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with KeePassXC last updated 12 hours ago and TeamPass 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: KeePassXC uses Typescript, Python, Golang, C, Objective-C, C++ while TeamPass leverages JavaScript, PHP.
TeamPass has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to KeePassXC which began 11 years ago. This 4.2-year head start suggests TeamPass may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the GPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Password Managers. However, they also have distinct specializations: KeePassXC also focuses on Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Both KeePassXC and TeamPass offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.