Learn how KeePassXC and Psono differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password managers is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsLicense
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
psono-server
KeePassXC appears to have several advantages over Psono, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
KeePassXC significantly outpaces Psono in community adoption with 29,500 stars compared to 104 stars on GitHub. This 283.7x difference suggests KeePassXC has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, KeePassXC has 1,982 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
KeePassXC is growing faster, adding 527 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against adding 1 stars for Psono (+1%). KeePassXC is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with KeePassXC last updated 3 days ago and Psono 6 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with KeePassXC beginning 11 years ago and Psono 10 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: KeePassXC is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Psono uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Password Managers. However, they also have distinct specializations: KeePassXC also focuses on Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Both KeePassXC and Psono offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.