Learn how Bitwarden and Psono differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password managers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
v2026.10.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
bitwarden/server
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsLicense
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
psono-server
Bitwarden appears to have several advantages over Psono, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Bitwarden significantly outpaces Psono in community adoption with 20,479 stars compared to 104 stars on GitHub. This 196.9x difference suggests Bitwarden has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Bitwarden has 1,817 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Bitwarden is growing faster, adding 277 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against adding 1 stars for Psono (+1%). Bitwarden is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Bitwarden last updated 6 hours ago and Psono 6 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Bitwarden beginning 11 years ago and Psono 10 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Bitwarden is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Psono uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Password Managers.
Both Bitwarden and Psono offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.