What is the main difference between Bitwarden and TeamPass?

Bitwarden and TeamPass are both password managers but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Bitwarden or TeamPass?

The choice between Bitwarden and TeamPass depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Bitwarden to TeamPass?

Migration between Bitwarden and TeamPass is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn more

Bitwarden vs TeamPass

Learn how Bitwarden and TeamPass differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password managers is best for you.

Bitwarden

Bitwarden is an open source password manager that securely stores, shares, and autofills passwords across unlimited devices.

Visit Bitwarden Read more

20,641stars+278(+1.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
4 hours ago
Repository age
11 years
Version
v2026.10.1
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
bitwarden/server

TeamPass

Collaborative password manager with folder-level access control, AES-256-GCM encryption, governance tools, and Linux password rotation, runs on your own servers.

Visit TeamPass Read more

1,892stars+57(+3.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
1 day ago
Repository age
15 years
Version
3.2.4.3
License
GPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
teampass

Detailed Comparison

Both Bitwarden and TeamPass have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Bitwarden wins

Community & Popularity

Bitwarden significantly outpaces TeamPass in community adoption with 20,641 stars compared to 1,892 stars on GitHub. This 10.9x difference suggests Bitwarden has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Bitwarden has 1,834 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

TeamPass wins

Growth Momentum

TeamPass is growing faster, adding 57 stars in the last 30 days (+3.1%) against adding 278 stars for Bitwarden (+1.4%). TeamPass is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Bitwarden last updated 4 hours ago and TeamPass 1 day ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Bitwarden uses SCSS, C# while TeamPass leverages PHP.

TeamPass wins

Project Maturity

TeamPass has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Bitwarden which began 11 years ago. This 4.0-year head start suggests TeamPass may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Bitwarden is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while TeamPass uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable