Learn how Bitwarden and Vaultwarden differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password managers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 hours agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
v2026.10.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
bitwarden/server
Last 30 days
Last commit
17 hours agoRepository age
9 yearsVersion
1.37.4License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
vaultwarden
Both Bitwarden and Vaultwarden have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Vaultwarden significantly outpaces Bitwarden in community adoption with 69,685 stars compared to 20,479 stars on GitHub. This 3.4x difference suggests Vaultwarden has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Vaultwarden has 3,369 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Vaultwarden is growing faster, adding 1,490 stars in the last 30 days (+2.2%) against adding 277 stars for Bitwarden (+1.4%). Vaultwarden is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Bitwarden last updated 5 hours ago and Vaultwarden 17 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Bitwarden uses JavaScript, CSS, SCSS, C# while Vaultwarden leverages Typescript, Python, Rust.
Bitwarden has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Vaultwarden which began 9 years ago. This 2.3-year head start suggests Bitwarden may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Password Managers.
Both Bitwarden and Vaultwarden offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.