Learn how Bitwarden and Vaultwarden differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password managers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Bitwarden and Vaultwarden have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Vaultwarden significantly outpaces Bitwarden in community adoption with 68,580 stars compared to 20,244 stars on GitHub. This 3.4x difference suggests Vaultwarden has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Vaultwarden has 3,284 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Vaultwarden is growing faster, adding 1,600 stars in the last 30 days (+2.4%) against adding 156 stars for Bitwarden (+0.8%). Vaultwarden is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Bitwarden last updated 34 minutes ago and Vaultwarden 9 hours ago.
Bitwarden has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Vaultwarden which began 9 years ago. This 2.3-year head start suggests Bitwarden may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Password Managers.
Both Bitwarden and Vaultwarden offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.