Learn how Passbolt and Vaultwarden differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password managers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 days agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
v5.18.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
passbolt_api
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
9 yearsVersion
1.37.5License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
vaultwarden
Both Passbolt and Vaultwarden have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Vaultwarden significantly outpaces Passbolt in community adoption with 70,780 stars compared to 6,237 stars on GitHub. This 11.3x difference suggests Vaultwarden has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Vaultwarden has 3,460 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Vaultwarden is growing faster, adding 1,607 stars in the last 30 days (+2.3%) against adding 65 stars for Passbolt (+1.1%). Vaultwarden is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Passbolt last updated 4 days ago and Vaultwarden 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Passbolt uses JavaScript, CSS, PHP while Vaultwarden leverages Typescript, Python, Rust.
Passbolt has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Vaultwarden which began 9 years ago. This 2.0-year head start suggests Passbolt may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Password Managers.
Both Passbolt and Vaultwarden offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.