What is the main difference between Passbolt and PearPass?

Passbolt and PearPass are both password managers but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Passbolt or PearPass?

The choice between Passbolt and PearPass depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Passbolt to PearPass?

Migration between Passbolt and PearPass is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

CodeRabbit – The leading AI Code Review platform. Ship better quality code in 50% less time, with 90% fewer bugs.

Learn More

Passbolt vs PearPass

Learn how Passbolt and PearPass differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password managers is best for you.

Passbolt

Open source password manager focused on security, collaboration and privacy for organizations

Visit Passbolt Read more

6,142stars+45(+0.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
12 days ago
Repository age
11 years
Version
v5.16.0
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
passbolt/passbolt_api

PearPass

Open-source password manager with peer-to-peer syncing, local storage, and end-to-end encryption. No cloud servers, complete privacy control across devices.

Visit PearPass Read more

536stars+3(+0.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 months ago
Repository age
10 months
Version
v2.1.0
License
Apache-2.0
Repository
tetherto/pearpass-app-desktop

Detailed Comparison

Passbolt appears to have several advantages over PearPass, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Passbolt wins

Community & Popularity

Passbolt significantly outpaces PearPass in community adoption with 6,142 stars compared to 536 stars on GitHub. This 11.5x difference suggests Passbolt has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Passbolt has 402 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Comparable

Growth Momentum

Passbolt and PearPass are moving at much the same rate, adding 45 stars and adding 3 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.7% vs +0.6%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.

Passbolt wins

Development Activity

Passbolt shows more recent development activity with its last commit 12 days ago, while PearPass was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Passbolt is being more actively maintained.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Passbolt uses CSS, PHP while PearPass leverages Typescript, JSX.

Passbolt wins

Project Maturity

Passbolt has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to PearPass which began 10 months ago. This 9.9-year head start suggests Passbolt may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Passbolt is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while PearPass uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Password Managers.

Passbolt wins

Hosting & Deployment

Passbolt provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while PearPass may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

Other tool comparisons to consider