Passbolt vs PearPass
Learn how Passbolt and PearPass differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these security & privacy tools is best for you.
Learn how Passbolt and PearPass differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these security & privacy tools is best for you.
Passbolt
Auto-fetched .
PearPass
Stars
426Forks
51Last commit
16 hours agoRepository age
5 monthsLicense
Apache-2.0
Auto-fetched .
Detailed Comparison
Passbolt appears to have several advantages over PearPass, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Passbolt appears to have several advantages over PearPass, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Passbolt significantly outpaces PearPass in community adoption with 5,862 stars compared to 426 stars on GitHub. This 13.8x difference suggests Passbolt has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Passbolt has 382 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Passbolt last updated 16 days ago and PearPass 16 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Passbolt uses CSS, PHP while PearPass leverages Typescript, JSX.
Project Maturity
Passbolt has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to PearPass which began 5 months ago. This 9.9-year head start suggests Passbolt may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
The projects use different licenses: Passbolt is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while PearPass uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Security & Privacy, Password Managers.
Hosting & Deployment
Passbolt provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while PearPass may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.