What is the main difference between Passbolt and PearPass?

Passbolt and PearPass are both security & privacy tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Passbolt or PearPass?

The choice between Passbolt and PearPass depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Passbolt to PearPass?

Migration between Passbolt and PearPass is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.

Learn More

Passbolt vs PearPass

Learn how Passbolt and PearPass differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these security & privacy tools is best for you.

Passbolt

Open source password manager focused on security, collaboration and privacy for organizations

Visit Passbolt Read more

6,081stars+56(+0.9%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
10 years
Version
v5.14.3
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
passbolt/passbolt_api

PearPass

Open-source password manager with peer-to-peer syncing, local storage, and end-to-end encryption. No cloud servers, complete privacy control across devices.

Visit PearPass Read more

531stars+11(+2.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
5 days ago
Repository age
8 months
Version
v2.1.0
License
Apache-2.0
Repository
tetherto/pearpass-app-desktop

Detailed Comparison

Passbolt appears to have several advantages over PearPass, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Passbolt wins

Community & Popularity

Passbolt significantly outpaces PearPass in community adoption with 6,081 stars compared to 531 stars on GitHub. This 11.5x difference suggests Passbolt has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Passbolt has 394 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

PearPass wins

Growth Momentum

PearPass is growing faster, adding 11 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 56 stars for Passbolt (+0.9%). PearPass is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Passbolt last updated 2 days ago and PearPass 5 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Passbolt uses CSS, PHP while PearPass leverages Typescript, JSX.

Passbolt wins

Project Maturity

Passbolt has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to PearPass which began 8 months ago. This 9.9-year head start suggests Passbolt may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Passbolt is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while PearPass uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Security & Privacy, Password Managers.

Passbolt wins

Hosting & Deployment

Passbolt provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while PearPass may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

Other tool comparisons to consider