Learn how Bitwarden and Cozy differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these security & privacy tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Bitwarden and Cozy have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Bitwarden significantly outpaces Cozy in community adoption with 18,485 stars compared to 1,264 stars on GitHub. This 14.6x difference suggests Bitwarden has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Bitwarden has 1,566 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Bitwarden last updated 11 hours ago and Cozy 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Bitwarden uses SCSS, C# while Cozy leverages Golang.
Both projects started around the same time, with Bitwarden beginning 10 years ago and Cozy 10 years ago.
Cozy is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Bitwarden's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Security & Privacy. However, they also have distinct specializations: Bitwarden also focuses on Password Managers while Cozy extends into Cloud File Sync & Share, Cloud Storage.
Both Bitwarden and Cozy offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.