Learn how Bitwarden and Cozy differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
15 hours agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
v2026.10.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
bitwarden/server
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
1.6.66License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
cozy/cozy-stack
Bitwarden appears to have several advantages over Cozy, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Bitwarden significantly outpaces Cozy in community adoption with 20,471 stars compared to 1,268 stars on GitHub. This 16.1x difference suggests Bitwarden has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Bitwarden has 1,813 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Bitwarden is growing faster, adding 273 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against losing 2 stars for Cozy (-0.2%). Bitwarden is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Bitwarden last updated 15 hours ago and Cozy 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Bitwarden uses SCSS, C# while Cozy leverages Golang.
Both projects started around the same time, with Bitwarden beginning 11 years ago and Cozy 10 years ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Bitwarden also focuses on Password Managers while Cozy extends into Cloud File Sync & Share.
Both Bitwarden and Cozy offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.