Learn how Peergos and Seafile differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
15 hours agoRepository age
13 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Repository
peergos/peergos
Last 30 days
Last commit
23 days agoRepository age
14 yearsVersion
v9.0.5Self-hosted
YesRepository
haiwen/seafile
Seafile appears to have several advantages over Peergos, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Seafile significantly outpaces Peergos in community adoption with 15,435 stars compared to 2,552 stars on GitHub. This 6.0x difference suggests Seafile has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Seafile has 1,677 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Peergos and Seafile are moving at much the same rate, adding 21 stars and adding 117 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.8% vs +0.8%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Peergos last updated 15 hours ago and Seafile 23 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Peergos uses Java while Seafile leverages Python, C, Objective-C, C++.
Seafile has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Peergos which began 13 years ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests Seafile may have more mature features and established processes.
Peergos is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Seafile's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share. However, they also have distinct specializations: Peergos also focuses on Encrypted Storage while Seafile extends into Document Management Systems, Secure Document Sharing.
Seafile provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Peergos may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs