Learn how Peergos and Seafile differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Repository

Seafile appears to have several advantages over Peergos, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Seafile significantly outpaces Peergos in community adoption with 15,146 stars compared to 2,446 stars on GitHub. This 6.2x difference suggests Seafile has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Seafile has 1,673 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Seafile is growing faster, adding 141 stars in the last 30 days (+0.9%) against adding 12 stars for Peergos (+0.5%). Seafile is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Peergos last updated 2 days ago and Seafile 12 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Peergos uses Java while Seafile leverages Python, C, Objective-C, C++.
Seafile has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Peergos which began 13 years ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests Seafile may have more mature features and established processes.
Peergos is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Seafile's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share. However, they also have distinct specializations: Peergos also focuses on Distributed Storage, Encrypted Storage while Seafile extends into Document Management Systems, Secure Document Sharing.