Learn how Ente and Peergos differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these encrypted storage tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Both Ente and Peergos have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ente significantly outpaces Peergos in community adoption with 28,809 stars compared to 2,512 stars on GitHub. This 11.5x difference suggests Ente has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ente has 1,797 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Peergos is growing faster, adding 67 stars in the last 30 days (+2.7%) against adding 532 stars for Ente (+1.9%). Peergos is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ente last updated 13 hours ago and Peergos 13 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Java. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ente uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js, Golang, C, Rust, Objective-C, Swift, C++, Ruby, Kotlin, Tauri, Dart.
Peergos has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Ente which began 4 years ago. This 9.3-year head start suggests Peergos may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Encrypted Storage. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ente also focuses on Cloud Storage, Photo & Video Management while Peergos extends into Cloud File Sync & Share, Distributed Storage.
Ente provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Peergos may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.