Learn how Ente and Peergos differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these encrypted storage tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Ente appears to have several advantages over Peergos, particularly in popularity, growth and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ente significantly outpaces Peergos in community adoption with 28,417 stars compared to 2,446 stars on GitHub. This 11.6x difference suggests Ente has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ente has 1,768 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Ente is growing faster, adding 519 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 12 stars for Peergos (+0.5%). Ente is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ente last updated 10 hours ago and Peergos 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Java. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ente uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js, Golang, C, Rust, Objective-C, Swift, C++, Ruby, Kotlin, Tauri, Dart.
Peergos has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Ente which began 4 years ago. This 9.3-year head start suggests Peergos may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Encrypted Storage. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ente also focuses on Cloud Storage, Photo & Video Management while Peergos extends into Cloud File Sync & Share, Distributed Storage.
Ente provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Peergos may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.