Learn how Ente and ownCloud differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud storage tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Ente and ownCloud have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ente significantly outpaces ownCloud in community adoption with 28,503 stars compared to 2,104 stars on GitHub. This 13.5x difference suggests Ente has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ente has 1,783 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Ente is growing faster, adding 498 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against adding 18 stars for ownCloud (+0.9%). Ente is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ente last updated 7 hours ago and ownCloud 3 hours ago.
ownCloud has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Ente which began 4 years ago. This 3.3-year head start suggests ownCloud may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Ente is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while ownCloud uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud Storage. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ente also focuses on Photo & Video Management, Encrypted Storage while ownCloud extends into Cloud File Sync & Share.
Both Ente and ownCloud offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.