Learn how OpenCloud and ownCloud differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v9.1.0License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
opencloud
Last 30 days
Last commit
21 hours agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v8.2.3License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
owncloud/ocis
Both OpenCloud and ownCloud have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenCloud leads in popularity with 6,347 stars vs 2,192 stars for ownCloud. The 190% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, ownCloud has 287 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
OpenCloud is growing faster, adding 171 stars in the last 30 days (+2.8%) against adding 39 stars for ownCloud (+1.8%). OpenCloud is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenCloud last updated 9 hours ago and ownCloud 21 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Golang, PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenCloud uses JSX while ownCloud leverages Python, SCSS, Vue.
ownCloud has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to OpenCloud which began 2 years ago. This 5.5-year head start suggests ownCloud may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share.
Both OpenCloud and ownCloud offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs