Learn how OpenCloud and ownCloud differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both OpenCloud and ownCloud have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenCloud leads in popularity with 5,854 stars vs 2,104 stars for ownCloud. The 178% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, ownCloud has 268 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
OpenCloud is growing faster, adding 107 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 18 stars for ownCloud (+0.9%). OpenCloud is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenCloud last updated 17 hours ago and ownCloud 3 hours ago.
ownCloud has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to OpenCloud which began 2 years ago. This 5.5-year head start suggests ownCloud may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share. However, they also have distinct specializations: ownCloud extends into Cloud Storage.
Both OpenCloud and ownCloud offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs